Image sharpness: The Factors That Affect It

By Geoff Harris

Image sharpness is arguably the holy grail for photographers. If you have deep enough pockets you can spend thousands and thousands of pounds or dollars on lenses that will help you achieve just that. However, lenses aren't the only factor in the sharpness equation. There are others that you need to be aware of. In no particular order here are a few of them...

Horse racing, Hexham Race Course, Northumberland, England

If your subject is moving the shutter speed use will also determine how sharply its rendered. In this image of a horse race I deliberately used a long shutter speed to create an abstract blur.

Shutter speed

The shutter speed you use is a big factor in how sharp an image is. This is particularly true if you're handholding your camera. Humans aren't perfectly steady. Even when standing still the simple act of breathing causes movement. If you use too low a shutter speed then this unsteadiness will cause camera shake. Where the shutter speed/camera shake threshold lies depends on you and the focal length of the lens fitted to your camera (and whether your camera or lens has image stabilisation). The longer the focal length of the lens the greater the risk of camera shake. A reasonable rule to follow is to match the shutter speed to the focal length of the lens. If you're using a 500mm lens say you'll need to use at least 1/500 as a shutter speed.

Exhibit at the Great North Museum (Hancock), Newcastle upon Tyne, Tyne and Wear, England

At maximum aperture depth of field is at its minimum. Careful focusing is therefore require to ensure that the most important part of the image is sharp.

Even when a camera is fitted to a tripod you still have to be aware of camera shake. If your tripod is on soft ground (such as sand) it can sink during an exposure. If you move around during an exposure this can cause the tripod to move too. This can be a problem when shooting star trails on clear, frosty evenings. The temptation to move around to keep warm often proves far too tempting but should be resisted as far as humanly possible. While we're on the subject of tripods setting them up correctly is important too. Splay the legs out to their furthest extent and try to avoid using the centre column if possible. Both of these tips will keep your tripod more stable than it otherwise would be.














See close-to it's easy to say which is a higher resolution image. Now view both from 10 feet away. It's not so easy now is it?


There are two factors to be aware of with lenses when it comes to sharpness. First, lenses are at their optical peak in the mid-range of apertures. Use a lens wide open (that is, using maximum aperture) and the results can be pretty gruesome. Typically the centre of the lens is better than the corners at maximum aperture. Corners tend to be softer than the centre and don't get close to catching up in terms of sharpness until you've stopped down to f/8 or f/11.

The other factor is depth of field created by the aperture. At maximum aperture depth of field is at its minimum. This means that you have focus more accurately in order to ensure than your subject is sharp. The temptation is therefore to use the smallest aperture possible to maximise depth of field. In theory this is fine. However, a phenomenon called diffraction rears its ugly head when small apertures are used. Diffraction reduces resolution making an image look softer. Again, using a mid-range aperture is often the best compromise to maximise image quality.


This image suffers from camera shake, clearly visible at 100%. Shrink the image however and it looks much sharper. The size an image is reproduced is also a factor in how sharp in looks.

Viewing distance

You've shot an image and are viewing it at 100% on your monitor. It looks disappointingly soft and the temptation is to bin the image. Resist that temptation! I'm use a 24mp camera. At 100% magnification I can view about a quarter of the whole image on my monitor. If I were to make a print four times the size of my monitor the print would be 30 x 20 inches. There's no way I'd view a print that size from the same distance as my monitor. I'd step back. In stepping back the print would look sharper.

Images look sharper the further away from them you are. Don't believe me? Take a look at the image below. It doesn't look very sharp does it? Now view it from ten feet away. It looks sharper doesn't it? Viewing distance is a strangely neglected factor in how sharp an image is perceived to be.

Geoff Harris

I am a journalist and photographer and currently work as the Deputy Editor of Amateur Photographer (AP) - the oldest weekly photographic magazine in the world. Before that I served as the editor of Digital Camera, Britain's best-selling photography magazine, for five years. During my time as editor it became the UK's top selling photo monthly and won Print Publication of the Year at the 2013 British Media Awards. As well as being lucky enough to get paid to write about photography, I've been fortunate to interview some of the greatest photographers in the world, including Elliott Erwitt, Don McCullin, Martin Parr, Terry O'Neill and Steve McCurry. This has been a wonderful learning experience and very influential on my photography. Beyond writing, I am a professional portrait, travel and documentary photographer, and reached the finals of the 2016 Pink Lady Food Photographer of the Year competition. I am a Licentiate of the Royal Photographic Society and hope to take my Associateship whenever I can find the time. In addition I write about well being/personal development and antiques collecting for a range of other titles, including BlueWings, the in-flight magazine of Finn Air.

Stay updated

Receive free updates by email including special offers and new courses.

You can unsubscribe at any time


Related posts

Our best selling courses

Awards & Accreditations

  • Good Web Guide
  • Red Herring Winner
  • Education Investor Awards 2021 - Finalist
  • CPD Accredited (provider 50276)